This standard of proof is much higher than the civil standard, called “ preponderance of the evidence,” which only requires a certainty greater than 50 percent.įor an article detailing the origins of this standard, download this University of Chicago Law Review article.įor Supreme Court cases related to this legal standard, see Patterson v. Beyond A Shadow of a Doubt: Faith for Healing by Removing Doubts Roger Sapp on. In other words, the jury must be virtually certain of the defendant’s guilt in order to render a guilty verdict. Non-stop HAMILTON I intend to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt With my assistant counsel- BURR Co-counsel Hamilton, sit down Our client Levi Weeks is innocent. This means that the prosecution must convince the jury that there is no other reasonable explanation that can come from the evidence presented at trial. In a criminal case, the prosecution bears the burden of proving that the defendant is guilty beyond all reasonable doubt. Beyond a reasonable doubt is the legal burden of proof required to affirm a conviction in a criminal case.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |